Washington, DC, 12 February (H.S.): United States Attorney General Pam Bondi delivered a blistering defense of President Donald Trump and her Justice Department's stewardship of the Jeffrey Epstein files during a fractious House Judiciary Committee hearing on Wednesday, prefacing her remarks with an expression of profound sorrow to survivors while rebuking Democratic inquisitors as obfuscators of executive triumphs.

With Epstein victims arrayed behind her, Bondi—besieged since her February 2025 White House distribution of barren binders to conservative influencers—urged survivors to relay abuse intelligence to authorities, pledging meticulous investigation of viable criminal claims, yet spurned Rep. Pramila Jayapal's demand to swivel and apologize explicitly for departmental impositions, dismissing it as theatrics.

The conclave swiftly degenerated into vituperative melee, as Bondi parried queries on errant redactions—unveiling victims' private particulars, inclusive of nude photographs—with broadsides impugning Democrats' preoccupation with political vendettas over quotidian perils like violent crime and unauthorized migration.

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), the panel's ranking Democrat, arraigned Bondi for siding with malefactors through sloppy, inconsistent or nonexistent excisions, prognosticating her tenure as a massive Epstein coverup; Bondi riposted by branding Raskin a washed-up loser lawyer—not even a lawyer, while Republican firebrand Rep. Jim Jordan extolled her abrogation of Biden-era prosecutions against conservatives, including Trump's discarded indictments, proclaiming, What a difference a year makes.

GOP maverick Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), architect of disclosure legislation, excoriated Bondi for victim data exposures as literally the worst thing you could do to survivors, eliciting her retort of hypocrite afflicted by Trump-derangement syndrome.

Vermont Rep. Becca Balint (D) voiced exasperation—This is pathetic. I am not asking trick questions. The American people deserve to know—amid Bondi's deflections to district violence statistics.

Bondi's testimony—one annum into a roiled directorship shadowed by politicization strictures, including a grand jury's rebuff of charges against Democrats for dissuading military fealty to putative illegal orders—coincides with DOJ assertions of exhaustive exertions to anonymize voluminous files under congressional fiat, notwithstanding inevitable lapses rectified post-notification.

The July 2025 pronouncement negating an Epstein client list—contradicting Bondi's antecedent Fox News allusion thereto, subsequently reframed as aggregate documents—ignited conservative umbrage, culminating in mandated divulgences bereft of seismic disclosures.

Amid ancillary tempests—Gates Foundation disavowals, transnational resignations, and Indian parliamentary imbroglio—Bondi touted depoliticization strides, restoring the DOJ to core missions post-bloated bureaucracy, as Republicans endeavored redirection to law-and-order verities.

---------------

Hindusthan Samachar / Jun Sarkar