
Lucknow, August 05 (HS): As the House met at 11:00 a.m. on Wednesday, the
third day of the Uttar Pradesh Assembly monsoon session, the Speaker condemned
Tuesday's uproar. Crossing the boundaries of parliamentary conduct is extremely
detrimental to this institution. He said that what happened yesterday was not
appropriate for a constitutional institution. We must decide what legacy we are
bequeathing to the next generation.
Assembly Speaker Satish Mahana said from the bench that in a democracy there
can be pro-government, pro-opposition, dialogue, consensus, and disagreement.
This is also a part of democracy. When someone asked me, I said that the
opposition is not there to praise the government. It is there to raise the
problems of the people. The government's job is to tell the House about its
work done and to introduce public welfare schemes. He said that such moments
also come in the House when a slightly uncomfortable situation arises, yet the
House has been functioning for the last four and a half years. It is not that
before yesterday, opposition members did not come for recess during the last
four and a half years. They came, considered the time and circumstances, said
their point and went back to their seats.
The Speaker of the Assembly said, I want to point out that Ambedkar
said that time will tell whether the problem lies not in the Constitution, but
in the individual. Over the past four and a half years, we have striven to
ensure that the House's proceedings are conducted in a manner consistent with
the Constitution's dignity and importance. As Speaker, for the first time in
the country, I classified members according to their qualifications. I
explained that the legislature is second to none. Doctors, engineers, lawyers,
and academics have been elected to the House.
Referring to an old
incident in the House, he said, I remember the then Chief Minister
Akhilesh Yadav and the Leader of the Opposition, Swami Prasad Maurya, and I had
said even then that the Leader of the House should be respected. The oath that
members of the House take implies that they will respect the Leader of the
House. If we do not rise above party lines to respect the Leader of the House,
this institution will become ineffective. I doubt whether the dignity of all
members will be maintained. He said that debate, agreement, and
disagreement are part of democracy. However, we must maintain the decorum of
language. Crossing the boundaries of parliamentary conduct is extremely harmful
to this institution. But I am saddened and disappointed by what happened in the
House yesterday.
For the first time, I realized that either my efforts were lacking, or Dr.
Ambedkar was right when he said that the flaw lies not in the Constitution but
in individuals. Yesterday, the behavior of a member offended me. Despite
repeated warnings, he refused to maintain decorum. He continued speaking in the
same manner even after leaving. I have tried to impart to this House everything
I have learned during my political career. But I feel that we have failed in
our efforts. Unless members speak well, the constitutional institution cannot
be elevated. Mahana said, I appeal to all of you here to rise above party
lines and consider what traditions we are leaving behind for future
generations. How meaningful are we embodying the ideology and dreams of the
freedom fighters. Finally, I would also like to say that despite my
refusal, some members have provided videos and photographs of the meeting to
the media and social media. These have been circulated. This is objectionable.
He said that I had also requested the respected media members not to
broadcast it. Earlier, when the video recording was being done, I had also
refused to broadcast it, so they did not show it. Yesterday, despite my
refusal, the members posted photos and videos of the incident on social media.
This is extremely objectionable. If you want to send the message that we cannot
improve, it is sad. The conduct of one member does not reflect the conduct of
one member, but rather sends a message to the public about the 403 members of
the Assembly. It is noteworthy that on Tuesday, Samajwadi Party MLAs created a
ruckus in the Assembly. During that time, SP MLA Engineer Sachin Yadav was
protesting with a poster bearing the Chief Minister's picture. The Speaker
stopped him, but he refused. Consequently, he was suspended. On Wednesday,
Assembly Speaker Satish Mahana adjourned the House for half an hour at around
11:20 am and then extended the adjournment until 1 pm.
Hindusthan Samachar / Abhishek Awasthi